Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Linking Patent Reform and Civil Litigation Reform

68 Pages Posted: 23 Feb 2015 Last revised: 20 Nov 2015

Greg Reilly

IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law

Date Written: March 6, 2015

Abstract

Patent reform increasingly focuses on discovery. Discovery is perceived as disproportionately expensive and burdensome in patent cases. Excessive discovery is said to fuel so-called “patent trolls” and impose an unhealthy tax on innovation and competition. These supposedly exceptional problems have led to exceptional patent-only reform proposals, such as delaying most discovery for over a year and reversing the 75-year old allocation of discovery costs.

Treating patent litigation as exceptional has a siloing effect. Patent reform debates ignore parallel debates over general civil litigation reform that raise the same arguments about disproportionately expensive and burdensome discovery and propose their own set of reforms. This Article links patent reform to civil litigation reform, arguing that patent discovery is not exceptional in its costs, supposed effects, or causes. Instead, patent discovery is representative of a subset of discovery-intensive civil cases. The main problem with discovery in patent cases is not abusive tactics of “patent trolls” or inherent technical complexity but rather complex and open-ended remedial doctrines. Doctrinal complexity is not unique to patent litigation.

Pinpointing the source of patent discovery problems also suggests a solution – delaying costly and burdensome remedial discovery until after liability is established. This solution need not be limited to patent cases. Greater use of staged litigation – litigating and resolving some potentially case-dispositive issues before any discovery or other litigation occurs on more discovery-intensive issues – is a potentially valuable tool for reforming general civil litigation. Notably, staged litigation preserves the plaintiff’s access to information and right to a jury trial, overcoming objections to other efforts to reduce civil litigation costs, like Twombly/Iqbal plausibility pleading.

Keywords: Patent Reform, Civil Litigation Reform, Discovery, Patent Assertion Entities, Patent Trolls, Iqbal, Twombly, Civil Justice

Suggested Citation

Reilly, Greg, Linking Patent Reform and Civil Litigation Reform (March 6, 2015). 47 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 179 (2015); California Western School of Law Research Paper No. 15-03. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2568443 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2568443

Greg Reilly (Contact Author)

IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law ( email )

565 W. Adams St.
Chicago, IL 60661-3691
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
167
Rank
150,077
Abstract Views
869