Human Capital, Fertility, and Economic Growth
44 Pages Posted: 26 May 2004 Last revised: 31 Oct 2022
Date Written: August 1990
Abstract
Our model of growth departs from both the Malthusian and neoclassical approaches by including investments in human capital. We assume, crucially, that rates of return on human capital investments rise, rather than, decline, as the stock of human capital increases, until the stock becomes large. This arises because the education sector uses human capital note intensively than either the capital producing sector of the goods producing sector. This produces multiple steady scares: an undeveloped steady stare with little human capital, low rates of return on human capital investments and high fertility, and a developed steady stats with higher rates of return a large, and, perhaps, growing stock of human capital and low fertility. Multiple steady states mean that history and luck are critical determinants of a country's growth experience.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Why Do Some Countries Produce so Much More Output Per Worker than Others?
By Robert E. Hall and Charles I. Jones
-
Why Do Some Countries Produce so Much More Output Per Worker than Others?
By Robert E. Hall and Charles I. Jones
-
The Effects of Corruption on Growth, Investment, and Government Expenditure
By Paolo Mauro
-
The Persistence of Corruption and Slow Economic Growth
By Paolo Mauro
-
The Allocation of Talent: Implications for Growth
By Kevin M. Murphy, Andrei Shleifer, ...
-
By Robert E. Hall and Charles I. Jones
-
Good Policy or Good Luck? Country Growth Performance and Temporary Shocks
By William Easterly, Michael Kremer, ...