A Review of 'The History Manifesto'

6 Pages Posted: 25 Feb 2015

See all articles by Mark Koyama

Mark Koyama

George Mason University - Department of Economics; George Mason University - Mercatus Center

Date Written: February 24, 2015

Abstract

I review Jo Guldi and David Armitage's The History Manifesto. I argue that the author's call for historians to return to the studying the longue-durée is indeed important. Nevertheless, I show that the History Manifesto does not succeed in making a persuasive case for privileging the role of historians in studying the longue-durée. It is a deeply flawed book that mischaracterizes numerous debates in economic history and other social sciences.

Keywords: Book Review, Economic History

JEL Classification: N01

Suggested Citation

Koyama, Mark, A Review of 'The History Manifesto' (February 24, 2015). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2569191

Mark Koyama (Contact Author)

George Mason University - Department of Economics ( email )

4400 University Drive
Fairfax, VA 22030
United States

HOME PAGE: http://mason.gmu.edu/~mkoyama2/About.html

George Mason University - Mercatus Center ( email )

3434 Washington Blvd., 4th Floor
Arlington, VA 22201
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
409
Abstract Views
2,521
PlumX Metrics