Mediation and Administrative Merits Review: An Impossible Goal?

(2007) 18 Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal 227

8 Pages Posted: 26 Feb 2015

See all articles by Niamh Kinchin

Niamh Kinchin

University of Wollongong - Faculty of Business and Law

Date Written: 2007

Abstract

The benefits of mediation within the litigious realm have long been established. But what happens when the dispute falls within the forum of administrative merits review? The unique characteristics of a dispute created by an appeal from an administrative decision may not accommodate the philosophy, logistics and procedures of mediation. The power dichotomy of the disputants, inflexible decisions within institutionalised contexts and public policy concerns all work together to present mediators with challenging environment for open and earnest negotiation. Consideration of the appropriateness of mediation within this forum must take into account both the context (the objectives of the court or tribunal, the potential for bias, and whether mediation is mandatory) and the content (the power differences of the parties, the appropriateness of confidentiality and the ability to monitor ‘fairness’) of the decision being reviewed. Only then can the objectives of mediation and administrative merits review be accommodated.

Keywords: Mediation, ADR, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Administrative Review, Administrative Law, Merits Review, Tribunals

Suggested Citation

Kinchin, Niamh, Mediation and Administrative Merits Review: An Impossible Goal? (2007). (2007) 18 Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal 227, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2569457

Niamh Kinchin (Contact Author)

University of Wollongong - Faculty of Business and Law ( email )

Wollongong, NSW 2520
Australia

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
69
Abstract Views
449
rank
469,615
PlumX Metrics