Against Immutability

101 Pages Posted: 27 Feb 2015 Last revised: 27 Oct 2015

Date Written: October 26, 2015

Abstract

Courts often hold that antidiscrimination law protects “immutable” characteristics, like sex and race. In a series of recent cases, gay rights advocates have persuaded courts to expand the concept of immutability to include not just those traits an individual cannot change, but also those considered too important for anyone to be asked to change. Sexual orientation and religion are paradigmatic examples. This Article critically examines this new concept of immutability, asking whether it is fundamentally different from the old one and how it might apply to characteristics on the borders of employment discrimination law’s protection, such as obesity, pregnancy, and criminal records. It argues that the new immutability does not avoid the old version’s troublesome judgments about which traits are morally blameworthy and introduces new difficulties by requiring problematic judgments about which traits are important. Ultimately, immutability considerations of both the old and new varieties distract from the aim of employment discrimination law: targeting unreasonable and systemic forms of bias.

Keywords: employment discrimination, weight discrimination, pregnancy accommodation, criminal records and employment, immutability

Suggested Citation

Clarke, Jessica, Against Immutability (October 26, 2015). Yale Law Journal, Vol. 125, p. 2, 2015. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2569843

Jessica Clarke (Contact Author)

Vanderbilt University Law School ( email )

131 21st Avenue South
Nashville, TN 37203-1181
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
301
rank
96,885
Abstract Views
1,539
PlumX Metrics