Which Way to Nudge? Uncovering Preferences in the Behavioral Age

43 Pages Posted: 28 Feb 2015 Last revised: 11 Sep 2015

Date Written: August 25, 2015

Abstract

Behavioral Law and Economics has created a dilemma for policymakers. On the one hand, research from the field suggests a wide range of unconventional policy instruments (“nudges”) may be used to shape people’s voluntary choices in order to lead them to the option they most prefer. On the other hand, the very nature of these new instruments precludes researchers from measuring people’s preferences in the traditional way, i.e., by looking to see which option people choose from the set of available choices. As a result, policymakers often lack the information they need to design nudges that will make people better off.

To tackle this dilemma, I propose a new framework that focuses on the distinction between those decision-makers who respond to nudges and those who do not. The framework highlights that existing methods for designing nudges come up short—none accounts for what I argue is the crucial piece of information: the preferences of the nudge-sensitive decision-makers. After exploring this dilemma, the Essay describes two new approaches for uncovering the preferences of this group and argues that they hold promise for informing the design of nudges in a wide range of policy settings.

Keywords: Behavioral Law and Economics, Nudges

Suggested Citation

Goldin, Jacob, Which Way to Nudge? Uncovering Preferences in the Behavioral Age (August 25, 2015). Yale Law Journal, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2570930 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2570930

Jacob Goldin (Contact Author)

Stanford Law School ( email )

559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
431
Abstract Views
3,082
rank
73,329
PlumX Metrics