Is Judge Hanen's Smackdown of Executive Action on Immigration 'Narrowly Crafted'?

21 Pages Posted: 2 Mar 2015

See all articles by Anil Kalhan

Anil Kalhan

Drexel University Thomas R. Kline School of Law

Date Written: February 21, 2015

Abstract

In a recent essay in the Wall Street Journal, Professor Michael McConnell argues that Judge Andrew Hanen’s February 2015 opinion and order blocking some of the Obama administration’s recent executive actions on immigration should not be understood as questioning the executive branch's authority to exercise "prosecutorial discretion," but rather as questioning the extension of "affirmative benefits" to recipients of deferred action under those initiatives. According to Professor McConnell, Judge Hanen’s opinion “carefully lays out the legal case against the program” and ultimately concludes that "prosecutorial discretion is limited to nonenforcement and doesn’t entitle the executive branch to grant affirmative benefits such as work permits and welfare without statutory authority and notice-and-comment rule-making." Such "benefits," he asserts, have "never been part of prosecutorial discretion." On that basis, McConnell concludes that Judge Hanen “narrowly crafted [his] order not to touch on prosecutorial discretion” and that the decree therefore does not interfere with executive discretion to set enforcement priorities.

In this essay, I critically assess these claims. McConnell is entirely correct that Judge Hanen at least professes to preserve the executive branch’s ability to establish enforcement priorities and exercise prosecutorial discretion. And it is also true that Judge Hanen exhibits considerable ire over the prospect of "award[ing] … benefits to otherwise removable aliens." However, contrary to McConnell's suggestion, Judge Hanen’s opinion is remarkably sweeping in its tenor and its potential significance. Ultimately, the ruling does not turn on any sort of distinction between the exercise of prosecutorial discretion, on the one hand, and the extension of "affirmative benefits," on the other.

Keywords: immigration, deferred action, prosecutorial discretion, DACA, DAPA

Suggested Citation

Kalhan, Anil, Is Judge Hanen's Smackdown of Executive Action on Immigration 'Narrowly Crafted'? (February 21, 2015). Drexel University Thomas R. Kline School of Law Research Paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2571079 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2571079

Anil Kalhan (Contact Author)

Drexel University Thomas R. Kline School of Law ( email )

3320 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
+1 215 804-9098 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.kalhan.com

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
45
Abstract Views
722
PlumX Metrics