Defining and Achieving Good Governance

Turnbull, S. 2016, Defining and achieving good governance. In Aras, G., & Ingley, C. (Eds.) Corporate Behavior and Sustainability: Doing Well by Being Good, Farnham, UK: Ashgate Gower Publishers.

18 Pages Posted: 2 Mar 2015 Last revised: 14 Jan 2016

See all articles by Shann Turnbull

Shann Turnbull

International Institute for Self-Governance; Sustainable Money Working Group; New Garden City Alliance

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: March 1, 2015

Abstract

The research question for this paper is to identify how some widely accepted governance practices are not necessarily consistent with the objectives of good governance. One reason is that there is little agreement as to what are the objectives of generic good governance, be it in the public, private or non-profit sectors. The objective of good governance suggested for all sectors in this paper is the ability of an organization to further the purpose for its existence without imposing costs, harms and risks on society while acting equitably and ethically. In this way Corporate Social Responsibilities (CSR) become integrated into corporate governance while minimizing the extent, cost and need for government laws, regulations, regulators, legal actions and codes. However, many laws, regulations and codes accepted, promoted and even imposed by some regulators and governance-rating agencies include unethical counter productive conflicts of interests. Examples are identified with suggestions on how corporate constitutions could be amended to remove and/or ethically manage commonly accepted problems on a self-enforcing basis by separating governance powers from management. A separation of powers facilitates stakeholder engagement to obtain feedback and correction on any costs, harms and risks introduced by the organization while obtaining intelligence for achieving operating benefits with good governance. Because unethical counter productive practices are so widely accepted by regulators and practitioners, this paper concludes that the involvement of lay lawmakers is required to provide the leadership for achieving good governance.

Keywords: Conflicts, Co-regulation, CSR, Ethics, Self-governance

JEL Classification: B41, D21, D22, D63, G30, K12, K22, K23, L14, L20, L50, M14

Suggested Citation

Turnbull, Shann, Defining and Achieving Good Governance (March 1, 2015). Turnbull, S. 2016, Defining and achieving good governance. In Aras, G., & Ingley, C. (Eds.) Corporate Behavior and Sustainability: Doing Well by Being Good, Farnham, UK: Ashgate Gower Publishers. . Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2571724 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2571724

Shann Turnbull (Contact Author)

International Institute for Self-Governance ( email )

PO Box 266 Woollahra
Cell: +61418222378
Sydney, New South Wales 1350
Australia
+61293278487 (Phone)
+61280655905 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://independent.academia.edu/ShannTurnbull/CurriculumVitae
SKYPE: shann.turnbull

Sustainable Money Working Group ( email )

Holyoake House
Hanover Street
Manchester, M60 0AS
United Kingdom

New Garden City Alliance ( email )

113 Guinness Court
Snowsfields
London, UK, hello@gardencities.org.uk SE1 3TA
United Kingdom
+44 207 378 1902 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.gardencities.org.uk

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
175
Abstract Views
1,112
rank
153,612
PlumX Metrics