The Establishment Clause of the Australian Constitution: Three Propositions and a Case Study

26 Pages Posted: 3 Mar 2015

See all articles by Luke Beck

Luke Beck

Monash University - Faculty of Law

Date Written: 2014

Abstract

This article argues that the reasoning in Attorney-General (Vic) ex rel Black v Commonwealth, the sole High Court case on the meaning of the establishment clause of s 116 the Constitution, is too narrow and requires reconsideration. It begins that process of reconsideration and argues that the proper meaning of the establishment clause encompasses at least the following three propositions. First, the establishment clause prohibits federal expenditure for religious purposes such as religious activities. Secondly, the establishment clause prohibits the Commonwealth from instituting programs that result in a religion or multiple religions becoming identified with the Commonwealth. Thirdly, the establishment clause prohibits the Commonwealth from instituting programs that result in a religion or multiple religions becoming identified with the states and territories. The article concludes by testing the Australian Government’s National School Chaplaincy and Student Welfare Program against those three propositions.

Keywords: establishment clause, religious establishment, section 116, school chaplains

Suggested Citation

Beck, Luke, The Establishment Clause of the Australian Constitution: Three Propositions and a Case Study (2014). Adelaide Law Review, Vol. 35, No. 2, 2014, pp. 225-250.. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2572181

Luke Beck (Contact Author)

Monash University - Faculty of Law ( email )

Wellington Road
Clayton, Victoria 3800
Australia

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
44
Abstract Views
286
PlumX Metrics
!

Under construction: SSRN citations while be offline until July when we will launch a brand new and improved citations service, check here for more details.

For more information