Müller, Martin. 2014. “After Sochi 2014: Costs and Impacts of Russia’s Olympic Games.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 55 (6): 628–55. doi:10.1080/15387216.2015.1040432 (open access CC-BY)
28 Pages Posted: 3 Mar 2015 Last revised: 30 May 2015
Date Written: April 9, 2015
This paper assesses the outcomes of the 2014 Winter Olympic Games in Sochi, Russia, examining the costs and economic impact of the event, the prospects for the long-term use of venues and infrastructure, and the attitudes of the global and the Russian population. It finds that total costs were USD 55 billion, having increased 4.5 times from USD 12 billion at the time of the bid. Of this total, about USD 16 billion were sports-related costs. After accounting for inflation, this makes Sochi the second most expensive Olympics ever in terms of sports-related costs and the most expensive Olympics in terms of cost per event. With a public share of 96.5% of funding, the Sochi Games had the highest proportion of public money for any Olympic Games on record. The benefit from this high cost, however, is limited. Extensive construction of hotels has led to overcapacities, investors have defaulted on state-backed loans and there is no coherent plan for the after-use of venues and some of the largest infrastructure projects. As a consequence, the Sochi Olympics will continue to be a burden for the Russian state, with expenses for operation, maintenance and foregone interest and tax revenue in the order of USD 1.2 billion per year. The event also did not manage to improve the image of Russia in the world and among the domestic population support dropped over the seven years of its implementation, most notably among the local population.
Keywords: Olympic Games; Sochi; mega-event; mega-project; costs; benefits; tourism; infrastructure
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Müller, Martin, After Sochi 2014: Costs and Impacts of Russia's Olympic Games (April 9, 2015). Müller, Martin. 2014. “After Sochi 2014: Costs and Impacts of Russia’s Olympic Games.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 55 (6): 628–55. doi:10.1080/15387216.2015.1040432 (open access CC-BY) . Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2572479 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2572479