Abstract

https://ssrn.com/abstract=2573334
 


 



Nudge: Three Degrees of Concern


Robert Baldwin


London School of Economics - Law Department

February 1, 2015

LSE Law - Policy Briefing Paper No. 7

Abstract:     
Behaviour change strategies such as ‘nudge’ have become hugely popular with administrations on both sides of the Atlantic. Nudging, however, is a practice that raises both conceptual and controversial issues and these have to be addressed in examining the conditions under which nudging can be used effectively and acceptably. Hitherto there has been a lack of conceptual clarity in many debates about nudge but a key to understanding nudge-related issues is to distinguish between three very different degrees of nudge. These three degrees raise different, and identifiable, concerns and it is possible to assess the extent to which these worries can be responded to in positive terms. The compatibility of nudging with other control devices cannot be assumed and, when contemplating nudging, it is essential to be clear and open about the philosophical basis for such action as well as to be aware that different modes of intervention may operate with clashes of logic that threaten not only effectiveness but also the serving of representative and ethical ends.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 4

Keywords: Regulation, Regulation Theory, Nudge, Behavioural Economics


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 5, 2015  

Suggested Citation

Baldwin, Robert, Nudge: Three Degrees of Concern (February 1, 2015). LSE Law - Policy Briefing Paper No. 7. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2573334 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2573334

Contact Information

Robert Baldwin (Contact Author)
London School of Economics - Law Department ( email )
Houghton Street
London, WC2A 2AE
United Kingdom
44 0171 955 7258 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 881
Downloads: 299
Download Rank: 76,641