Due Process of War in the Age of Drones

34 Pages Posted: 9 Mar 2015 Last revised: 26 Apr 2016

See all articles by Joshua Andresen

Joshua Andresen

University of Surrey School of Law

Date Written: March 6, 2015


The debate over how to properly rein in the errors and abuses of the drone program remains stalled between two ineffective and constitutionally problematic extremes. While some have defended Executive unilateralism and others have called for an ex ante Drone Court, this Note defends ex post judicial review as the only constitutional and effective way to restore our constitutional balance of powers and the rule of law. The Note shows how judges should apply the international law of war to adjudicate the lawfulness of drone strikes and details a legal strategy for plaintiffs to bring a case under the Alien Tort Statute that reaches the merits. Adjudicating the legality of drone strikes for their compliance with the international law of war is an eminently legal task that our courts should feel compelled to carry out. Adherence to the rule of law, our constitutional separation of powers, and our national security interests all speak for ex post judicial review of drone strikes.

Keywords: Drones, Judicial Review, Separation of Powers, Law of War, Declaratory Judgment, Alien Tort Statute

Suggested Citation

Andresen, Joshua, Due Process of War in the Age of Drones (March 6, 2015). Yale Journal of International Law, Vol. 41, p. 155, 2016, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2574914 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2574914

Joshua Andresen (Contact Author)

University of Surrey School of Law ( email )

Frank Whittle Building
Guildford, GU2 7XH
United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics