Citations (5)



Vote Buying

Richard L. Hasen

University of California, Irvine School of Law

California Law Review, Vol. 88, p. 1323, October 2000
Loyola-LA Legal Studies

Commentators almost universally condemn political vote buying, though the reasons for condemnation fall into three distinct categories: equality, efficiency, and inalienability. Any one of these three reasons may be sufficient to explain and justify a ban on vote buying. This overdetermination matters, not for the ban on core vote buying, but for myriad other situations that are similar to the core case but deviate from it in some way.

The Article applies the three criteria of equality, efficiency, and inalienability to evaluate a number of non-core vote buying practices: (a) legislative logrolling; (b) corporate vote buying; (c) payments to increase turnout; (d) candidate campaign promises and campaign contributions; and (e) voting in special district elections. Part II concludes that some of these practices violate only one or two of the three anti-vote buying criteria, and that a decision on each practice's desirability turns on a normative evaluation of these criteria.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 51

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: January 30, 2001 ; Last revised: July 24, 2013

Suggested Citation

Hasen, Richard L., Vote Buying. California Law Review, Vol. 88, p. 1323, October 2000; Loyola-LA Legal Studies. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=257564

Contact Information

Richard L. Hasen (Contact Author)
University of California, Irvine School of Law ( email )
401 E. Peltason Drive
Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-1000
United States
949 824 3072 (Phone)
949 824 0895 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://law.uci.edu/faculty/page1_r_hasen.html
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,068
Downloads: 522
Download Rank: 40,064
Citations:  5