Urban Renewal Amidst National Divides: Can Housing Development (Partially) Correct Past Injustice?

41 Pages Posted: 10 Mar 2015

See all articles by Neta Ziv

Neta Ziv

Tel Aviv University - Buchmann Faculty of Law

Date Written: 2015


Community economic development and urban regeneration have long been considered strategies to alleviate urban poverty, strengthen distressed neighborhoods, and counter racial segregation. Despite differences in their underlying methods, both rely on a faith in the market economy acting as a constructive force for betterment. Hence, community economic development (CED) does not rely on rights as the basis for social transformation, and urban regeneration does not talk of past injustice. In contrast, the motivation of rights advocacy is to address previous policies and practices of state mistreatment. As such, it has traditionally addressed public agencies as the target for remedying ethnic segregation and subordination, incorporating demands to correct past injustice by recognizing the right to equality, housing, and dignity. To be sure, social integration and racial justice often motivate CED and urban regeneration programs. Nevertheless, the main assumption underlying initiatives of this sort is that the power of market economy — if harnessed and regulated properly — is an effective vehicle for achieving positive change within poor and minority communities.

This article explores if and how a CED/urban regeneration project can incorporate a commitment to human rights. I do this by analyzing an Israeli initiative in an Arab neighborhood, Jaffa, which is a “mixed” Jewish-Arab city. The project involves a housing development for a national minority in Israel — the Arab citizens — that constitutes twenty percent of Israel’s population. The development is challenging, both theoretically and practically. It raises numerous practical hurdles and is economically, socially, and administratively complex.

Theoretically, it is a test for the intersection of human rights and market development. The state (national and local) has largely been responsible for past discrimination and distress of the Jaffa Arab community, and market forces have exacerbated this inequality. The Jaffa CED initiative relies on market forces to spur correction of past injustice; however, human rights considerations are infused therein, given the role of the state, which remains present in the commercial transaction, demarcating the boundaries of market activity.

Keywords: Community Economic Development, Poverty Lawyering, Law and Social Change, Human Rights

Suggested Citation

Ziv, Neta, Urban Renewal Amidst National Divides: Can Housing Development (Partially) Correct Past Injustice? (2015). Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law Policy, Vol. XXII, No. 1, 2015, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2576106

Neta Ziv (Contact Author)

Tel Aviv University - Buchmann Faculty of Law ( email )

Ramat Aviv
Tel Aviv 69978, IL

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics