Teaching Interpretation and Structure of the Revised Uniform Partnership Act: Moren Ex Rel. Moren v. Jax Restaurant and the Duty of Indemnification

32 Pages Posted: 11 Mar 2015

See all articles by George M. Cohen

George M. Cohen

University of Virginia School of Law

Date Written: March 2015

Abstract

This essay was written for the Saint Louis Law Journal’s forthcoming issue on Teaching Business Associations. The essay describes how one might teach Moren ex rel. Moren v. Jax Restaurant, which holds that under the Revised Uniform Partnership Act (RUPA) a general partnership held vicariously liable for a partner’s negligence is not entitled to indemnity from the negligent partner. In the essay, I suggest ten topics that a class discussion of the case could cover and offer thoughts on those topics. The topics are: (1) Partner’s Right of Indemnity and Negative Implication: Section 401(c); (2) Relationship of Partnership Law to Other Law: Section 104(a); (3) Consistency and "Ordinary Course of Business": Sections 301 and 305; (4) Textualist Reading of Section 401(c): Unlimited Indemnity; (5) RUPA Comments on LLPs and Section 306(c); (6) Changes from UPA Section 18(b); (7) Duty of Care: Section 404(c); (8) Exhaustion rule: Section 307(d); (9) Contracting for Indemnity and Liability Insurance: Section 103; and (10) The Purposes of Partnership Vicarious Liability and the Facts of Moren. As this list shows, Moren offers a great opportunity to explore the interrelationship of a number of RUPA provisions, a variety of statutory interpretation techniques, the differences between RUPA and the prior Uniform Partnership Act (UPA), the relationship between RUPA and agency law, and the merits and mechanics of vicarious liability and indemnity in general partnerships. My thesis is that students who are led to work through the difficulties the case presents will be better prepared to deal with the intellectual and practical challenges of transactional law practice, and will be in a better position to counsel clients about business entities and the uncertainties that lawyers need to plan for.

Suggested Citation

Cohen, George M., Teaching Interpretation and Structure of the Revised Uniform Partnership Act: Moren Ex Rel. Moren v. Jax Restaurant and the Duty of Indemnification (March 2015). St. Louis University Law Journal, No. 59, 2015, Virginia Law and Economics Research Paper No. 6, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2576251 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2576251

George M. Cohen (Contact Author)

University of Virginia School of Law ( email )

580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States
(804) 924-3814 (Phone)
(804) 982-2079 (Fax)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
45
Abstract Views
714
PlumX Metrics