Congressional Dysfunction, Public Opinion, and the Battle Over the Keystone XL Pipeline

29 Pages Posted: 24 Mar 2015 Last revised: 15 Jan 2016

See all articles by Evan C. Zoldan

Evan C. Zoldan

University of Toledo College of Law

Date Written: December 17, 2015

Abstract

When President Obama vetoed the Keystone XL Pipeline Approval Act in March 2015, he signaled the end of a political drama that pitted Congress against the President, Democrats against Republicans, and the promise of jobs against concern for the environment. Like most drama in Washington, it burned bright and hot, but soon was overtaken by other, suddenly more urgent, matters.

Although news coverage of the pipeline has waned, the Keystone XL legislation represents the serious and enduring problem of congressional dysfunction. Using the Keystone XL legislation as a point of departure, this article offers insights into the inner workings of Congress, the role of deliberation in lawmaking, and the relationship between public opinion and the legislative process.

Keywords: Keystone XL Pipeline, Legislation, Legislative Process, Congressional Dysfunction, Constitutional Law

Suggested Citation

Zoldan, Evan Craig, Congressional Dysfunction, Public Opinion, and the Battle Over the Keystone XL Pipeline (December 17, 2015). 47 Loyola University Chicago Law Journal 617 (2015)., University of Toledo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2015-06, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2583406 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2583406

Evan Craig Zoldan (Contact Author)

University of Toledo College of Law ( email )

2801 W. Bancroft Street
Toledo, OH 43606
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
138
Abstract Views
832
rank
236,047
PlumX Metrics