Abstract

https://ssrn.com/abstract=2584119
 


 



New Historical Jurisprudence: Legal History as Critical Analysis of Law


Markus D. Dubber


University of Toronto - Faculty of Law

March 23, 2015

2 Critical Analysis of Law 1 (2015)

Abstract:     
This modest manifesto — or minifesto — portrays legal history as a mode of critical analysis of law, using the historical analysis of American penality as an illustration and the full-fledged manifestos by Piketty and Guldi & Armitage as points of reference. Historical analysis of law, in this light, appears as one mode of critical analysis among others, including, notably, comparative analysis of law, along with economic, philosophical, sociological, or ethical analysis of law, and so on. Historical analysis of law, in other words, is itself a mode of legal scholarship, not a subspecies of law or history. It is a comprehensive view of law from a particular critical vantage point: a way of doing law, rather than of doing things with law. Historical analysis of law in this sense is less “law and history” than “law as history,” less legal history than historical jurisprudence.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 18

Keywords: legal history, critical analysis of law, historical jurisprudence, Piketty, Armitage, Guldi

JEL Classification: K10


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 25, 2015  

Suggested Citation

Dubber, Markus D., New Historical Jurisprudence: Legal History as Critical Analysis of Law (March 23, 2015). 2 Critical Analysis of Law 1 (2015). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2584119

Contact Information

Markus D. Dubber (Contact Author)
University of Toronto - Faculty of Law ( email )
78 and 84 Queen's Park
Toronto, Ontario M5S 2C5
Canada
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.utoronto.ca/faculty-staff/full-time-faculty/markus-dubber

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 830
Downloads: 222
Download Rank: 108,303