Professional Status and the Freedom to Contract: Towards a Common Law Duty of Non-Discrimination

54 Pages Posted: 10 Jul 2001 Last revised: 17 Mar 2020

See all articles by Amnon Reichman

Amnon Reichman

University of Haifa - Faculty of Law

Date Written: 2001

Abstract

This paper suggests that Canadian common law doctrine, according to which businesses providing goods and services to the public at large are allowed to refuse service because of a customer’s group-based characteristics such as race, is inconsistent with previous case law as well as with the underlying reason-based structure of the common law. After suggesting that the common law has not been fully displaced by human rights legislation, the paper demonstrates that the common law contains three concrete articulations of a duty to provide equal service. It argues that at the core of the rationale that best fits these bodies of case law is a status-based demand placed on those interacting in their capacity as members of an impersonal profession to refrain from taking into account any personal or group-based characteristics beyond those relevant to the provision of goods and services around which the profession is organized.

Keywords: Private Law, Human Rights, Discrimination, Equality, Freedom of Contract, Canada (Canadian), Common Law, Status, Profession, Kant, Hegel, Civil Society, Goods and services, Common Callings, Public Accommodations

JEL Classification: k00. k10, k19, k20, k29, k31, k33, k42

Suggested Citation

Reichman, Amnon, Professional Status and the Freedom to Contract: Towards a Common Law Duty of Non-Discrimination (2001). Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, Vol. 14, No. 1, January 2001. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=258450

Amnon Reichman (Contact Author)

University of Haifa - Faculty of Law ( email )

Mount Carmel
Haifa, 31905
Israel

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
151
Abstract Views
1,568
rank
210,563
PlumX Metrics