Exhuming the Privileges or Immunities Clause to Bury Rational-Basis Review

Caleb Trotter

Pacific Legal Foundation


60 Loy. L. Rev. 909 (2014)

This Comment argues that the modern, New Deal-era substantive due process framework for analyzing court-recognized fundamental rights is constitutionally illegitimate and functionally inadequate. Thus, to properly protect the fundamental right to economic liberty, the United States Supreme Court should abandon this framework and employ the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment in its place.

Part II provides an overview of the Supreme Court’s treatment of economic liberty. Part III illustrates the inadequacy of the substantive due process framework, examines the difficulties occupational licensing regulations cause for entrepreneurs, and illustrates through public choice theory why courts should not rely on legislatures to ease the difficulties experienced by entrepreneurs. Finally, Part IV proposes that the Court should overrule the Slaughter-House Cases and resulting rise of rational-basis review and exhume the Privileges or Immunities Clause. Further, this Comment directly urges the Court to recognize economic liberty as a constitutional fundamental right.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 62

Keywords: constitutional law, economic liberty, judicial engagement, public choice theory, rational basis review, privileges or immunities clause, fourteenth amendment

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 28, 2015 ; Last revised: April 10, 2015

Suggested Citation

Trotter, Caleb, Exhuming the Privileges or Immunities Clause to Bury Rational-Basis Review (2014). 60 Loy. L. Rev. 909 (2014). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2585161

Contact Information

Caleb Trotter (Contact Author)
Pacific Legal Foundation ( email )
930 G Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.pacificlegal.org
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 197
Downloads: 18