Reframing Similarity Analysis in Copyright

46 Pages Posted: 1 Apr 2015 Last revised: 1 Sep 2015

See all articles by Kevin J. Hickey

Kevin J. Hickey

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Date Written: March 1, 2015


Central to nearly every copyright case is the question of substantial similarity. Substantial similarity attempts to determine when two works are so alike that the accused work is an infringement of the original. Although substantial similarity is a fundamental limit on the scope of copyright, equal in importance to fair use, it is plagued by confusion and governed by a series of arcane tests that differ in each circuit. Even more troubling, courts lack a consistent method to go about comparing two works, i.e., how the comparison between two works is framed. There is no consensus, for example, on whether the original work or the accused work should be used as the baseline when assessing similarity. Courts sometimes adopt the perspective of the original creator, and sometimes of the alleged infringer, in determining whether seemingly copyrightable expression has become an uncopyrightable idea or functional standard. Courts are even confused as to whether dissimilarities and new material added by the defendant have any relevance to the comparison.

This Article seeks to bring analytical clarity to copyright’s similarity analysis, with a focus on these often-implicit framing issues. It argues that how courts frame the comparison, much more so than the legal test applied, is strongly associated with case outcomes. It urges courts to take a consistent approach to framing issues in similarity analysis so as not to improperly bias the comparison in favor of either party. In particular, courts should adopt a flexible, highly contextual approach to framing. This method considers both the perspective of the original creator and of the alleged infringer, as relevant, in drawing the line between permissible and substantial copying. It rejects the rigid approach that predominates in the case law, and endeavors to consider all relevant information about what was copied, how it was used in context, and why. The result is a similarity analysis that is not only more consistent, but a robust and vital limitation on the scope of copyright.

Keywords: intellectual property, copyright, substantial similarity

Suggested Citation

Hickey, Kevin J., Reframing Similarity Analysis in Copyright (March 1, 2015). 93 Washington University Law Review (Forthcoming), Available at SSRN:

Kevin J. Hickey (Contact Author)

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics