Conjectures Regarding Empirical Managerial Accounting Research

21 Pages Posted: 7 Feb 2001

See all articles by Jerold L. Zimmerman

Jerold L. Zimmerman

University of Rochester - Simon Business School

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: February 13, 2001

Abstract

The empirical managerial accounting literature has failed to produce a substantive cumulative body of knowledge. This literature has not matured beyond describing practice to developing and testing theories explaining observed practice, like other areas of accounting research. While the lack of publicly available data is a popular reason for this literature's underdeveloped state, it is not the only one. Other conjectures include: its inductive approach, researchers' incentives, its use of non-economics-based frameworks, the lack of empirically testable theories, and its emphasis on decision making, not control.

JEL Classification: M40, M46

Suggested Citation

Zimmerman, Jerold L., Conjectures Regarding Empirical Managerial Accounting Research (February 13, 2001). Simon School of Business Working Paper No. FR 01-01; JAE Rochester Conference April 2000. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=258772 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.258772

Jerold L. Zimmerman (Contact Author)

University of Rochester - Simon Business School ( email )

Rochester, NY 14627
United States
585-275-3397 (Phone)
585-442-6323 (Fax)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,617
rank
10,020
Abstract Views
5,168
PlumX Metrics