Capitalitis? Effects of the 1960 Brazilian Capital Relocation

30 Pages Posted: 3 Apr 2015

Date Written: March 30, 2015

Abstract

National and region capital cities are substantially larger than other cities in their countries and typically larger than would be predicted by Zipf’s law. Though this empirical regularity is well established in the urban economics literature, causal estimates of the effect of capital designation on city size are hard to obtain. I use the 1960 relocation of the Brazilian capital from Rio de Janeiro to Brasília to identify the causal estimate of the effect of being a capital on city size, employment, and GDP. Using a synthetic controls strategy I find that losing the capital designation had no significant effects on Rio de Janeiro. In contrast, I find that Brasília experienced large and significant increases in population, employment and GDP after being designated the new Brazilian capital. Further, these increases are not entirely explained by the mechanical movement of government workers to Brasília; Instead, I find evidence of large spillovers in the private sector from this public sector shock. Finally, I show that some cities may violate the independence assumptions typically used when employing synthetic controls and I develop a method to deal with the resulting contamination of the donor units.

Keywords: Brazil, Capital-city bias

JEL Classification: R11, R12, J61, O54

Suggested Citation

Quistorff, Brian, Capitalitis? Effects of the 1960 Brazilian Capital Relocation (March 30, 2015). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2588620 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2588620

Brian Quistorff (Contact Author)

Office of the Chief Economist ( email )

1441 L Street NW
Washington, DC 20910
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
902
Abstract Views
19,732
Rank
50,697
PlumX Metrics