Anonymity and Online Commenting: An Empirical Study

9 Pages Posted: 8 Apr 2015  

Rolf Fredheim

University of Cambridge

Alfred Moore

University of Cambridge

John Naughton

University of Cambridge - Wolfson College

Date Written: April 7, 2015

Abstract

In this study we ask how regulations about commenter identity affect the quantity and quality of discussion on commenting fora. In December 2013, the Huffington Post changed the rules for its comment forums to require participants to authenticate their accounts through Facebook. This enabled a large-scale ‘before and after’ analysis. We collected over 42m comments on 55,000 HuffPo articles published in the period January 2013 to June 2014 and analysed them to determine how changes in identity disclosure impacted on discussions in the publication’s comment pages. Our results support the two dominant hypotheses in the literature: the move away from disposable identities resulted in sharply reduced commenting levels and improved user behaviour, partly because the worst offenders withdrew, and partly as commenters modified their tone. However, we found the rate of reduction to vary widely across subject areas: subjects particularly prone to spamming saw the greatest reduction in interaction, while a number of issues saw little reduction at all.

Keywords: Anonymity; Online Commenting; Public Sphere; Civility; Participation; Huffington Post

Suggested Citation

Fredheim, Rolf and Moore, Alfred and Naughton, John, Anonymity and Online Commenting: An Empirical Study (April 7, 2015). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2591299 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2591299

Rolf Fredheim

University of Cambridge ( email )

Trinity Ln
Cambridge, CB2 1TN
United Kingdom

Alfred Moore (Contact Author)

University of Cambridge ( email )

Trinity Ln
Cambridge, CB2 1TN
United Kingdom

John Naughton

University of Cambridge - Wolfson College ( email )

Barton Road
Cambridge, CB3 9BB
United Kingdom

Paper statistics

Downloads
140
Rank
169,520
Abstract Views
778