The New Insider Trading: Environmental Markets within the Firm

53 Pages Posted: 9 Apr 2015 Last revised: 21 Apr 2015

See all articles by Sarah E. Light

Sarah E. Light

University of Pennsylvania, The Wharton School - Legal Studies & Business Ethics Department

Date Written: April 8, 2015

Abstract

Environmental law scholarship has failed to appreciate fully the significant parallels between public law rules and private environmental governance — the traditionally “governmental” standard-setting functions that private parties, including business firms, non-governmental organizations, and individuals, have adopted to govern behavior respecting the environment. Recognizing these parallels should affect how we think both about what methods are best for setting environmental standards — prescription, markets, property rights, informational governance, or hybrid approaches — and who should be setting those standards — government regulators, private actors, or some combination of the two.

This Article examines the use of market approaches (carbon taxes) and hybrid market instruments (emissions trading) in the climate change context. A great deal of legal scholarship has examined both how to design carbon taxes and cap-and-trade systems and the merits of these approaches relative to other methods of public regulation, such as prescriptive rules. There has been virtually no legal scholarship, however, analyzing the adoption by business firms of private market and hybrid instruments to address climate change. By closely examining British Petroleum’s use of a private emissions trading scheme and Microsoft’s use of a private carbon fee, this Article illuminates some of the common challenges that decision makers face in designing public and private forms of environmental governance, while acknowledging some of the key distinctions. The Article concludes by arguing that this new “insider trading” has the potential to reap significant benefits in combating climate change. It is important, however, to remain cautious about its limitations.

Keywords: environmental law, private environmental governance, carbon tax, cap-and-trade, market instruments, Microsoft carbon fee, British Petroleum emissions trading

Suggested Citation

Light, Sarah E., The New Insider Trading: Environmental Markets within the Firm (April 8, 2015). Stanford Environmental Law Journal, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2015, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2591875

Sarah E. Light (Contact Author)

University of Pennsylvania, The Wharton School - Legal Studies & Business Ethics Department ( email )

3730 Walnut Street
Suite 600
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6365
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
272
Abstract Views
1,062
rank
126,897
PlumX Metrics