A Plebiscitary Bargain

London Law Review, Vol. 1, p. 497, 2005

11 Pages Posted: 10 Apr 2015

Date Written: July 1, 2005

Abstract

This Article explores whether public participation could be used to enhance the fairness and democratic legitimacy of plea bargaining in the United States. In particular, the Article focuses on a proposal made by Jason Mazzone for the use of grand jury-like panels to evaluate plea bargains. Although some scholars have praised Mazzone’s proposal, neither they nor Mazzone has argued that citizen review of plea bargains would be feasible. This Article defends the proposal of citizen review panels and offers practical ways to implement this proposal to avoid plea bargaining excesses and to render plea bargaining more democratically legitimate.

Keywords: plea bargains, juries, democracy, public participation

JEL Classification: K14

Suggested Citation

McLeod, Marah, A Plebiscitary Bargain (July 1, 2005). London Law Review, Vol. 1, p. 497, 2005. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2592087

Marah McLeod (Contact Author)

Notre Dame Law School ( email )

P.O. Box 780
Notre Dame, IN 46556-0780
United States
3127713448 (Phone)
3127713448 (Fax)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
34
Abstract Views
496
PlumX Metrics