Dealing with Difficulty. Tactics for Fluency in a Case of Complex Interdependence

32 Pages Posted: 15 Apr 2015

See all articles by Daniel Hogendoorn

Daniel Hogendoorn

Delft University of Technology

Ernst ten Heuvelhof

Delft University of Technology

Date Written: April 14, 2015

Abstract

Diversity has many benefits, but it brings difficulties that bring unease, tax cognition and heighten prediction-error. While cognitive science is increasingly consensual on the matter, there is little knowledge on how such costs are handled pragmatically in 'real world' interactions. This article presents a case study of urban development and roots it in supervening disciplines studying how people organize what goes on around them. Co-design by disparate, interdependent parties generated difficulty by disrupting routines of inference, representing and acting. It took two decades to decide the buildings' traits. We suggest pragmatic tactics used in non-routine cooperation serviceable to a cognitive need for fluency and coherence at low costs of attention. The typical actions found in response to difficulty included outsourcing to experts, imposing rules, and substituting make-believe. Sometimes difficulty was desired as a decoy and parties created confusion.

Keywords: interdependence; decision-making; case study; tactics

Suggested Citation

Hogendoorn, Daniel and ten Heuvelhof, Ernst, Dealing with Difficulty. Tactics for Fluency in a Case of Complex Interdependence (April 14, 2015). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2594259 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2594259

Daniel Hogendoorn (Contact Author)

Delft University of Technology ( email )

Stevinweg 1
Stevinweg 1
Delft, 2628 CN
Netherlands

Ernst Ten Heuvelhof

Delft University of Technology ( email )

Stevinweg 1
Stevinweg 1
Delft, 2628 CN
Netherlands

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
16
Abstract Views
315
PlumX Metrics