Residual Impact: Resentencing Implications of Johnson’s Potential Ruling on ACCA’s Constitutionality

115 Columbia Law Review Sidebar 55 (2015)

24 Pages Posted: 18 Apr 2015 Last revised: 29 Aug 2016

See all articles by Leah Litman

Leah Litman

University of Michigan Law School

Date Written: April 20, 2015

Abstract

This Essay examines the impact a favorable decision in Johnson v. United States could have at the various stages of post-conviction relief for three categories of prisoners -- prisoners whose convictions have not yet become final; prisoners whose convictions have become final but who have not yet filed a petition seeking post-conviction relief; and prisoners whose convictions have become final and who have already filed at least one petition seeking post-conviction relief. In doing so, it offers a reading of the relevant cases and statutes that permits any defendant sentenced under the Armed Career Criminal Act to obtain relief based on a decision invalidating the residual clause. It also highlights some under-explored statutes and doctrinal questions that courts will confront as they determine which prisoners should be resentenced in light of Johnson.

Suggested Citation

Litman, Leah, Residual Impact: Resentencing Implications of Johnson’s Potential Ruling on ACCA’s Constitutionality (April 20, 2015). 115 Columbia Law Review Sidebar 55 (2015) , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2594550

Leah Litman (Contact Author)

University of Michigan Law School ( email )

625 South State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
584
Abstract Views
3,613
rank
51,417
PlumX Metrics