The American Jury System: A Synthetic Overview

42 Pages Posted: 18 Apr 2015

See all articles by Richard Lempert

Richard Lempert

University of Michigan Law School

Date Written: April 16, 2015


This essay, originally written for a Swiss volume, and revised with added material for publication in the Chicago Kent Law Review, is intended to provide in brief compass a review of much that is known about the American jury system, including the jury's historical origins, its political role, controversies over its role and structure, its performance, both absolutely and in comparison to judges and mixed tribunals, and proposals for improving the jury system. The essay is informed throughout by 50 years of research on the jury system, beginning with the 1965 publication of Kalven and Zeisel's seminal book, The American Jury. The political importance of the jury is seen to lie more in the jury's status as a one shot decision maker largely independent of trial court bureaucracies than in its ability to nullify the law. Despite flaws in the jury process and room for improvement, the message that emerges from the literature is that juries take their job seriously and for the most part perform well. There is little reason to believe that replacing jury trials with bench trials or mixed tribunals would improve the quality of American justice, and some reason to think it might harm it.

Keywords: jury, juries, nullification, American jury, political role of juries, jury research

JEL Classification: K40

Suggested Citation

Lempert, Richard, The American Jury System: A Synthetic Overview (April 16, 2015). Chicago-Kent Law Review, Forthcoming, U of Michigan Public Law Research Paper No. 453, Available at SSRN:

Richard Lempert (Contact Author)

University of Michigan Law School ( email )

625 South State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics