Vodafone Transfer Pricing Decision: A Mistake of Judgment

9 Pages Posted: 24 Apr 2015 Last revised: 27 Apr 2016

See all articles by Dhruv Sanghavi

Dhruv Sanghavi

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Date Written: April 23, 2015


On 10 October 2014, the Bombay High Court exercised its non-appellate jurisdiction to quash a transfer pricing claim in the case of Vodafone, in which the tax authorities sought to apply the arm’s length principle to equity financing transactions. This interpretation has been accepted by the Government of India, which has decided not to appeal against the decision of the Bombay High Court. In this contribution, the author critically analyses the controversy to find that not only was the court’s interpretation of the law potentially incorrect, but also that it decided the case out of turn, and without allowing for the facts of the case to be adequately examined.

Suggested Citation

Sanghavi, Dhruv, Vodafone Transfer Pricing Decision: A Mistake of Judgment (April 23, 2015). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2598117 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2598117

Dhruv Sanghavi (Contact Author)

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics