The Indian Constitution and Horizontal Effect
Oxford Handbook of the Indian Constitution, Sujit Choudhry, Madhav Khosla and Pratap Mehta eds., Oxford University Press, 2016, Forthcoming
23 Pages Posted: 2 May 2015 Last revised: 6 May 2015
Date Written: 2015
Abstract
This chapter, written for the forthcoming Oxford Handbook of the Indian Constitution, describes and analyzes the application of the Fundamental Rights provisions of the Indian Constitution to non-state actors. It begins by presenting the general framework for conceptualizing this issue within comparative constitutional law, including the distinctions between (1) direct and indirect horizontal effect and (2) strong and weak indirect effect. The main body of the chapter consists of three sections setting out and discussing the Supreme Court of India's approach to each of the main paths to horizontal effect. Part II considers the direct application of a few Fundamental Rights to non-state actors. Part III looks at the indirect regulation of non-state actors that results from the existence of positive constitutional duties on the government to protect individuals from certain actions of their fellow citizens. Part IV analyzes whether, how, and to what extent the Fundamental Rights impact private law -- especially tort and contract law -- and thereby indirectly affect the individuals who are regulated by it.
The chapter concludes by arguing that, somewhat ironically, the Supreme Court's well-known expansion of the writ petition/public interest lawsuit has had the effect of limiting the reach of Fundamental Rights into the private sphere. As a public law remedy, the writ petition tends to reinforce rather than undermine the autonomy or separateness of private law, restricting the opportunities for interaction and influence. Accordingly, there are areas in which the Supreme Court has maintained more of a public-private division in the scope of constitutional rights than some other influential constitutional courts. For this reason, the indirect horizontal effect of the Fundamental Rights, at least as they relate to private law, is in practice weak rather than strong.
Keywords: India, horizontal effect, private actors, public-private distinction, fundamental rights, non-state actors
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Register to save articles to
your library
Recommended Papers
-
State Surveillance and the Right to Privacy in India: A Constitutional Biography
-
Crafting Constitutional Values: an Examination of the Supreme Court of India
-
Information for Submitting Articles to Law Reviews & Journals
By Allen Rostron and Nancy Levit
-
The Tension between Property Rights and Social and Economic Rights: A Case Study of India
By Namita Wahi
-
800 Years of the Magna Carta: The Magna Carta and the Making of the Indian Constitution
-
Building Legal Order in Ancient Athens
By Federica Carugati, Gillian K. Hadfield, ...