Pluralistic Legal Theories: In Search of a Common Denominator

23 Pages Posted: 3 May 2015 Last revised: 20 May 2018

Ronen Perry

University of Haifa - Faculty of Law

Date Written: May 1, 2015

Abstract

This Essay embarks on a meta-theoretical project to provide a unifying philosophical framework for pluralistic legal theories. Put differently, it seeks to identify a structural common denominator for all pluralistic theories of law, with a particular emphasis on private law (torts and contracts). The Essay first rejects the notion of complementarity coined by Nobel Prize laureate Niels Bohr, and applied to legal theory by Izhak Englard. It then advocates the allegedly Thomist aphorism hominem unius libri timeo (“I fear the man of a single book”), and connects it to Isaiah Berlin’s renowned distinction between the hedgehog and the fox.

Keywords: legal theory, jurisprudence, philosophy, pluralistic legal theories, contract law, tort law

JEL Classification: K00, K12, K13

Suggested Citation

Perry, Ronen, Pluralistic Legal Theories: In Search of a Common Denominator (May 1, 2015). Tulane Law Review, Vol. 90, pp. 647-669, 2015. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2601591

Ronen Perry (Contact Author)

University of Haifa - Faculty of Law ( email )

Mount Carmel
Haifa, 31905
Israel

HOME PAGE: http://weblaw.haifa.ac.il/en/faculty/perry/

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
332
rank
83,031
Abstract Views
1,070
PlumX