The Struggle for Deference in Canada

Mark Elliott and Hanna Wilberg eds., The Scope and Intensity of Substantive Review: Traversing Taggart's Rainbow (Hart, Oxford, 2015) (Forthcoming)

29 Pages Posted: 17 May 2015  

Paul Daly

University of Cambridge - Faculty of Law

Date Written: May 2, 2015

Abstract

In the common law tradition, courts are at the apex of the interpretive hierarchy. Traditionally, their role has been to answer legal questions authoritatively. A deferential approach to judicial review requires judges, however, to be satisfied by an answer that is merely reasonable, even on questions of law. This requires common law judges to pull against the current of tradition, a difficult task.

Since the 1970s, the Supreme Court of Canada has attempted to chart a deferential course to judicial review of interpretations of law. It has repeatedly been buffeted by traditionalist storms pushing it towards a more interventionist course. The concept of jurisdictional error, with its teaching that on some matters an administrative decision-maker must be correct or face judicial intervention, has usually been at the eye of the storm. This is the story I will tell.

Other jurisdictions may find useful lessons in Canada’s deferential journey. The story reveals the reasons why deference ought to be accorded to administrative decision-makers’ interpretations of legal provisions; it provides tools to counter interventionism. Yet it also reveals how difficult it is to convince courts to adopt a deferential approach; it warns of the serious commitment that is necessary to maintain deference. In short, the story of deference in Canadian administrative law is one of an apparently never-ending struggle.

Suggested Citation

Daly, Paul, The Struggle for Deference in Canada (May 2, 2015). Mark Elliott and Hanna Wilberg eds., The Scope and Intensity of Substantive Review: Traversing Taggart's Rainbow (Hart, Oxford, 2015) (Forthcoming). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2601799

Paul Daly (Contact Author)

University of Cambridge - Faculty of Law ( email )

10 West Road
Cambridge, CB3 9DZ
United Kingdom

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
236
rank
119,588
Abstract Views
813
PlumX