Behavioural Approaches: How Nudges Lead to More Intelligent Policy Design

Forthcoming in Contemporary Approaches to Public Policy, edited by Philippe Zittoun (LET-­‐ENTPE, University of Lyon) and B. Guy Peters (University of Pittsburgh)

29 Pages Posted: 16 May 2015 Last revised: 14 Aug 2015

See all articles by Peter John

Peter John

Department of Political Economy, KCL; University College London - School of Public Policy

Date Written: August 14, 2015

Abstract

This paper reviews the use of behavioural ideas to improve public policy. There needs to be a behavioural take on decision-making itself so that policies are designed in more effective ways. it recounts the beginnings of behavioural sciences as currently conceived and then setting out the massive expansion of interest that has come about since that time. It reports on how such ideas have had a large impact on governments at all levels across the world, but also noting how decision-making itself has been influenced by more policy-relevant ideas. The paper discusses the paradox that the very decision-makers themselves are subject to the same biases as the objects of behavioural economics, which might imply limitations in the choices of such interventions. Here the text of the chapter reengages with the classics of decision-making theory. The chapter notes how behavioural sciences need not depend on a top down approach but can incorporate citizen voice. The paper reviews how citizens and other groups can use behavioural cues to alter the behaviour of policy-makers in socially beneficial ways. The paper discusses how behaviourally informed measures could be integrated within the policy making process in ways that advance the effective use of evidence and nudge decision to make better policies.

Suggested Citation

John, Peter, Behavioural Approaches: How Nudges Lead to More Intelligent Policy Design (August 14, 2015). Forthcoming in Contemporary Approaches to Public Policy, edited by Philippe Zittoun (LET-­‐ENTPE, University of Lyon) and B. Guy Peters (University of Pittsburgh). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2604377

Peter John (Contact Author)

Department of Political Economy, KCL ( email )

Strand
London, WC2R 2LS
United Kingdom

University College London - School of Public Policy ( email )

29/30 Tavistock Square
London, WC1H 9QU
United Kingdom

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
235
rank
125,800
Abstract Views
818
PlumX Metrics