Does Competition Solve the Hold-Up Problem?
56 Pages Posted: 19 Feb 2001
Date Written: July 2000
Abstract
In an environment in which both buyers and sellers can undertake match specific investments, the presence of market competition for matches may solve hold-up and coordination problems generated by the absence of complete contingent contracts. In particular, this paper shows that when matching is assortative and sellers? investments precede market competition then investments are constrained efficient. One equilibrium is efficient with efficient matches but also there can be equilibria with coordination failures. Different types of inefficiency arise when buyers undertake investment before market competition. These inefficiencies lead to buyers? under-investments due to a hold-up problem but, when competition is at its peak, there is a unique equilibrium of the competition game with efficient matches; no coordination failures; and the aggregate hold-up inefficiency is small in a well defined sense independent of market size.
JEL Classification: D43, D83
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Bargaining, Mergers and Technology Choice in Bilaterally Oligopolistic Industries
By Roman Inderst and Christian Wey
-
Buyer Power and Supplier Incentives
By Roman Inderst and Christian Wey
-
Buyer Power and Supplier Incentives
By Roman Inderst and Christian Wey
-
Does Competition Solve the Hold-Up Problem?
By Leonardo Felli and Kevin W.s. Roberts
-
Does Competition Solve the Hold-Up Problem?
By Leonardo Felli and Kevin W.s. Roberts
-
Does Competition Solve the Hold-Up Problem?
By Leonardo Felli and Kevin W.s. Roberts
-
On Interdependent Supergames: Multimarket Contact, Concavity and Collusion
-
Retail Mergers: Buyer Power and Product Variety
By Roman Inderst and Greg Shaffer