SFU Economics Discussion Paper No. 01-1
25 Pages Posted: 21 Feb 2001
Date Written: February 2001
Market expectations of future return volatility play a crucial role in finance; so too does our understanding of the process by which information is incorporated in security prices through the trading process. This paper seeks to learn something about both of these issues by investigating empirically the role of trading volume (a) in predicting the relative informativeness of volatility forecasts produced by ARCH models versus the volatility forecasts derived from option prices, and (b) in improving volatility forecasts produced by ARCH and option models and combinations of models. We find that if trading volume was low during period t-1 then ARCH is much more important than options for forecasting future stock market volatility. Conversely, if volume was high during period t-1, then option-implied volatility is much more important than ARCH for forecasting future volatility. Our findings reveal an important regime-switching role for trading volume and suggest that option markets may be more efficient in high volume states. Results from various tests also uncover possible sources of volume-related nonlinearity in the relationship between past and future return innovations as captured by asymmetric ARCH models.
Keywords: return volatility, ARCH models, options-implied volatility, trading volume, combining models
JEL Classification: G12, C32, C52, C53
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Donaldson, R. Glen and Kamstra, Mark J., Volatility Forecasts, Trading Volume and the ARCH vs Option-Implied Volatility Tradeoff (February 2001). SFU Economics Discussion Paper No. 01-1; Sauder School of Business Working Paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=261003 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.261003