Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Essay: Celebrity Justice: Supreme Court Edition

13 Pages Posted: 31 May 2015 Last revised: 13 Jan 2016

Richard L. Hasen

University of California, Irvine School of Law

Date Written: January 12, 2016

Abstract

It is not your imagination. Supreme Court Justices are in the news more than ever, whether they are selling books, testifying before Congress, addressing a Federalist Society, or American Constitution Society event, or just talking to a Muppet on Sesame Street. The number of books about the Court and particular Justices continues to grow. Websites are now devoted to tracking the Justices’ movements as they crisscross the country (and the world) speaking to various audiences. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is even promoted on T-shirts as the “Notorious R.B.G.,” a riff on the name of famous rap artist Notorious B.I.G. She will soon be the topic of a biopic staring Natalie Portman.

That Supreme Court Justices have become celebrities is not news. Indeed, Justices’ public statements about same-sex marriage or Bush v. Gore often get extensive coverage, and extrajudicial comments on issues in pending cases sometimes lead to (ignored) calls for judicial recusal. However, until now no one has quantified the increase in the number of publicly reported events and interviews done by Justices overall and which Justices engage most reported extrajudicial speech.

Using an original dataset of reported instances of Supreme Court Justice extrajudicial appearances and interviews from 1960 to 2014, I find that the amount of reported extrajudicial speech has increased dramatically, especially in the past decade. From 1960-1969, research identified 193 publicly-reported appearances or interviews by all the Justices combined. This number fell by more than half (to 91) in the 1970s. From 2005-2014 it rose to 783, an eight-and-a-half-fold increase over the 1970s. The data show close to a doubling of the number of reported appearances from the 1970s to the 1980s, from the 1980s to 1990s, and from the 1990s to the 2000s. While a small part of that discrepancy between old and new rates of appearances may be due to research limitations as to older news sources, most of the discrepancy appears due to the great increase in the number of reported public appearances by Justices, driven in part by the swelled number of media outlets looking to interview and report on the Justices.

Further, not all Justices are created equal when it comes to Celebrity Justice. John Marshall Harlan, had a mere four reported appearances or interviews from 1960 until he left the Court in 1971. Four Justices had over 175 reported appearances or interviews: Stephen Breyer (224), Ruth Bader Ginsburg (195), Antonin Scalia (186), and Clarence Thomas (179). Dividing the number of appearances by the number of years a Justice was on the Court from 1960 until 2014 yields a “Celebrity Index.” In that Index, Justice Sonia Sotomayor is the highest scoring celebrity Justice, with a score of 13.6 annual reported appearances, followed by Justice Breyer, with a score of 11.2. Nine of the top ten Justices in the Index are current Supreme Court Justices. Finally, not all types of appearances are the same. Some Justices are much more likely to give interviews than others. Among current sitting Justices, Justice Sotomayor has given the largest percentage of interviews, and Justice Anthony Kennedy the smallest.

This Essay proceeds in three parts. Part I sets out the evidence of the rise of Celebrity Justices and the variations among Justices. Part II discusses methodological concerns. Part III briefly reflects on the normative question whether the rise of the Celebrity Justice is good or bad. I argue that the answer is mixed, but the trend of public appearances and interviews likely will continue to grow in coming years thanks to a drastically changed media landscape and a politicized Court.

Keywords: Supreme Court, extrajudicial speech, celebrity justice

Suggested Citation

Hasen, Richard L., Essay: Celebrity Justice: Supreme Court Edition (January 12, 2016). UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2015-61. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2611729

Richard L. Hasen (Contact Author)

University of California, Irvine School of Law ( email )

401 E. Peltason Drive
Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-1000
United States
949 824 3072 (Phone)
949 824 0895 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://law.uci.edu/faculty/page1_r_hasen.html

Paper statistics

Downloads
387
Rank
62,487
Abstract Views
6,206