Race, Federalism, and Voting Rights

31 Pages Posted: 30 May 2015 Last revised: 4 Aug 2015

Guy-Uriel E. Charles

Duke University School of Law; Duke Law School

Luis E. Fuentes-Rohwer

Indiana University Maurer School of Law

Date Written: May 28, 2015

Abstract

In Shelby County v. Holder, the Court struck down an important provision of the Voting Rights Act, section 4, on federalism grounds. The Court argued that Congress no longer had the power to enact section 4 because of the “federalism costs” imposed by the Act and because the Act violated “basic principles” of federalism. Unfortunately, the Court failed to articulate the costs to federalism imposed by the Act, much less conduct a cost-benefit analysis in order to determine whether the benefits of the Act outweighed its costs. Moreover, the Court failed to discuss whether the Reconstruction Amendments ought to matter at all to the federalism debate. In this Essay, we ask three basic questions in response to Shelby County. First, what does the Court mean by “federalism costs,” and why have these costs undermined the constitutionality of the VRA? Second, does the failure to discuss Reconstruction and the Reconstruction Amendments undermine the Court’s decision in Shelby County? And third, we ask how should we understand the utility of federalism in the context of race and voting. We suggest that if one purpose of federalism is that it enables minorities to engage in self-rule, we should ask whether federalism enables racial minorities to engage in self-rule.

Keywords: Race, federalism, voting rights, VRA, Shelby County

Suggested Citation

Charles, Guy-Uriel E. and Fuentes-Rohwer, Luis E., Race, Federalism, and Voting Rights (May 28, 2015). Duke Law School Public Law & Legal Theory Series No. 2015-24; Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper No. 321. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2611795 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2611795

Guy-Uriel Charles (Contact Author)

Duke Law School ( email )

Science Drive & Towerview Rd
Durham, NC 55455
United States

Duke University School of Law ( email )

Box 90360
Science Drive & Towerview Rd.
Durham, NC 27708
United States

Luis E. Fuentes-Rohwer

Indiana University Maurer School of Law ( email )

211 S. Indiana Avenue
Bloomington, IN 47405
United States
812-855-5003 (Phone)
812-855-0555 (Fax)

Paper statistics

Downloads
76
Rank
259,831
Abstract Views
450