Pairs Trading Using Fractional Cointegration Approach and Its Comparison with Cointegration Approach

15 Pages Posted: 5 Jun 2015

See all articles by Ehsan Ramezanifar

Ehsan Ramezanifar

Maastricht University - Department of Finance

Shapour Mohammadi

University of Tehran

Hossein Rad

University of Queensland Business School

Saeed Beyty

University of Tehran

Date Written: June 3, 2015

Abstract

The objective of this research is to apply the recently developed fractional cointegration vector autoregressive (FCVAR) model in developing pairs trading model and compare the results to that of the cointegration approach. To the best of our knowledge, there are no papers on fractional cointegration approach to date. Hence, this paper would be the first practical research based on fractional cointegration on futures market.

As the focus of this paper in on short-term trading positions, minute intraday interval prices are used to estimate the model and execute the trading strategies. First, we form two portfolios, “FCI” and “CI”. FCI is created using fractional cointegration and CI using cointegration approach. Then, using an estimation window of specific length, fractional cointegration test and cointegration test are preformed to verify the existence of fractional cointegration and cointegration relationship between the selected pair respectively. At last, the long-term equilibrium is estimated using Fractional Vector Error Correction Model (FVECM) for FCI and Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) for CI and based on this estimation the trading strategy is implemented.

The results show that the fractional cointegration approach yields statistically significant higher returns than the cointegration approach. The number of trades is also lower for fractional cointegration approach, which further contributes to the performance of the strategy. Finally, on a risk-adjusted level, the fractional cointegration approach has a higher Sortino ratio compared to the cointegration approach.

Furthermore, window sizes are optimized and the best and worst window sizes for both the cointegration and fractional cointegration estimation window and trading window is reported.

Keywords: Pairs Trading, Fractional Cointegration, Fractional Vector Error Correction Model, Mean Reversion

JEL Classification: G11, G12, G14

Suggested Citation

Ramezanifar, Ehsan and Mohammadi, Shapour and Rad, Hossein and Beyty, Saeed, Pairs Trading Using Fractional Cointegration Approach and Its Comparison with Cointegration Approach (June 3, 2015). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2614240 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2614240

Ehsan Ramezanifar

Maastricht University - Department of Finance ( email )

Maastricht
Netherlands

Shapour Mohammadi

University of Tehran ( email )

Enghelab Ave., 16 Azar Street
Tehran, UT Tehran
Iran

Hossein Rad (Contact Author)

University of Queensland Business School ( email )

St Lucia
Australia

Saeed Beyty

University of Tehran ( email )

Amirabad e shomali, kuye daneshgah e Tehran
Tehran, UT Tehran 5433174616
Iran

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,080
Abstract Views
4,212
Rank
38,007
PlumX Metrics