Prejudicial Character Evidence: How the Circuits Apply Old Chief to Federal Rule of Evidence 403

114 Pages Posted: 11 Jun 2015

See all articles by Hannah Goldman

Hannah Goldman

Fordham University, School of Law, Students

Date Written: January 3, 2015

Abstract

It is a fundamental principle of the American justice system that a defendant should be judged on the facts of the case at issue and not for the defendant’s general character or past discretions. Federal Rule of Evidence 404, which prohibits character evidence, addresses this issue. Rule 403 represents another principle of the justice system: the legal system favors admissibility of evidence over its exclusion. There are some exceptions to this principle, including when evidence is so highly prejudicial that it outweighs the benefits of its admission. Since 404(b) character evidence is almost always highly prejudicial to the defendant, trial judges are often asked to use their discretion to decide when to admit 404(b) evidence.

The lower courts have often been inconsistent when applying Rule 403 to 404(b) evidence. Understanding when to admit or exclude 404(b) evidence becomes more complicated when the defendant offers to concede to a point so that the prosecution does not need to introduce 404(b) evidence in order to prove it. In Old Chief v. United States, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed this issue. The holding, however, was narrowly tailored to its facts and provided little guidance in other cases. In addition, the Court introduced new concepts for trial judges to consider when deciding whether to admit 404(b) evidence. This Note examines the discrepancies in lower courts’ methods for admitting 404(b) evidence in light of Old Chief and offers a unifying and comprehensive test for trial judges to use when faced with this issue.

Suggested Citation

Goldman, Hannah, Prejudicial Character Evidence: How the Circuits Apply Old Chief to Federal Rule of Evidence 403 (January 3, 2015). Fordham Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2616479 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2616479

Hannah Goldman (Contact Author)

Fordham University, School of Law, Students ( email )

New York, NY
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
55
Abstract Views
367
rank
367,505
PlumX Metrics