Shots for Tots?

Hastings Center Report, Vol. 43:3, p. 34, 2013

U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 15-11

3 Pages Posted: 13 Jun 2015

See all articles by Eric A. Feldman

Eric A. Feldman

University of Pennsylvania Law School

Date Written: 2013

Abstract

By endorsing the use of a vaccine that makes the experience of puffing on a cigarette deeply distasteful, Lieber and Millum have taken the first few tentative steps into a future filled with medical interventions that manipulate individual preferences. It is tempting to embrace the careful arguments of “Preventing Sin” and celebrate the possibility that the profound individual and social costs of smoking will finally be tamed. Yet there is something unsettling about the possibility that parental discretion may be on the cusp of a radical expansion, one that involves a new and unexplored approach to behavior modification.

Keywords: Medical ethics, Vaccine, vaccination, Sarah R. Leiber, Joseph Millumethics, smoking, behavior modification, parental control, medical coercion, medical manipulation of children’s choices, self-destructive decisions

Suggested Citation

Feldman, Eric A., Shots for Tots? (2013). Hastings Center Report, Vol. 43:3, p. 34, 2013; U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 15-11. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2617784

Eric A. Feldman (Contact Author)

University of Pennsylvania Law School ( email )

3501 Sansom Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
215-573-6400 (Phone)
215-573-2025 (Fax)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
24
Abstract Views
622
PlumX Metrics