Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Public Policy Toward Life Saving: Maximize Lives Saved vs. Consumer Sovereignty

48 Pages Posted: 28 Jun 2004 Last revised: 26 Aug 2010

William Gould

Independent

Richard H. Thaler

University of Chicago - Booth School of Business; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

Date Written: 1980

Abstract

This paper is a theoretical analysis of individual and societal demands for life saving. We begin by demonstrating that the allocation of health expenditures to maximize lives saved may be inconsistent with the willingness-to-pay criterion and consumer sovereignty. We further investigate the effects of information on aggregate willingness to pay. This discussion is related to the concepts of statistical and identified lives. Methods of financing health expenditures are considered. We show that risk averse individuals may reject actuarially fair insurance for treatments of fatal diseases even if they plan to pay for the treatment if they get sick. This result has implications regarding the choice of treatment or prevention. Finally, we examine the importance of the timing of life-saving decisions. A conflict arises between society's preferences before it is known who will be sick and after, even if it is known in advance how many people will be sick.

Suggested Citation

Gould, William and Thaler, Richard H., Public Policy Toward Life Saving: Maximize Lives Saved vs. Consumer Sovereignty (1980). NBER Working Paper No. w0419. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=262046

William Gould

Independent

No Address Available

Richard H. Thaler (Contact Author)

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

University of Chicago - Booth School of Business ( email )

5807 S. Woodlawn Avenue
Chicago, IL 60637
United States
773-702-5208 (Phone)
773-702-0458 (Fax)

Paper statistics

Downloads
43
Abstract Views
731