How Not to Save the Planet

Brooks, Thom "How Not to Save the Planet," Ethics, Policy & Environment (target article) (Forthcoming)

28 Pages Posted: 20 Jun 2015

Date Written: June 19, 2015

Abstract

Climate change presents us with perhaps the most pressing challenge today. But is it a problem we can solve? This article argues that existing conservationist and adaptation approaches fail to satisfy their objectives. A second issue that these approaches disagree about how best to end climate change, but accept that it is a problem that can be solved. I believe this view is mistaken: a future environmental catastrophe is an event we might at best postpone, but not avoid. This raises new ethical questions for climate change: what are the moral implications of a future climatic catastrophe that might be delayed at best? What practical consequences might these implications yield? This article argues most political philosophers have misunderstood the kind of problem that climate change presents and the daunting challenges we face.

Keywords: Adaptation, Catastrophe, Climate Change, Conservation, Ecological Footprint, Polluter Pays Principle

JEL Classification: K00

Suggested Citation

Brooks, Thom, How Not to Save the Planet (June 19, 2015). Brooks, Thom "How Not to Save the Planet," Ethics, Policy & Environment (target article) (Forthcoming). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2620647

Thom Brooks (Contact Author)

Durham University ( email )

Durham Law School
Durham University
Durham, County Durham DH1 3ET
United Kingdom
+441913344365 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.dur.ac.uk/law/staff/?mode=staff&id=11140

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
139
Abstract Views
882
rank
225,061
PlumX Metrics