On the Threshold of the Third Globalization: Why Liberal Capitalism Might Fail?
18 Pages Posted: 26 Mar 2001
Date Written: December 1999
Abstract
The paper contrast three periods of globalization: the Roman-led one of the 2nd-4th century, the British-led one of the 19th century, and the current one led the United States. Each of them not only had a hegemon country but was associated with a specific ideology. However, in reaction to the dominant ideology and the effects of globalization (cultural domination, increasing awareness of ecoonomic inequities) an alternative ideology (in the first case, Christianity, in the second, Communism) sprang up. The alternative ideology uses the technological means supplied by the globalizers to subvert or attack the dominant ideological paradigm.
Keywords: Globalization, inequality
JEL Classification: N00
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By Roger H. Gordon and A. Lans Bovenberg
-
Capital Mobility in the World Economy: Theory and Measurement
-
Two Waves of Globalisation: Superficial Similarities, Fundamental Differences
-
International Capital Mobility in History: The Saving-Investment Relationship
-
The International Linkage of Real Interest Rates: the European - U.S. Connection
-
Saving-Investment Correlations: Immobile Capital, Government Policy or Endogenous Behavior?
-
Taxes and the Form of Ownership of Foreign Corporate Equity
By Roger H. Gordon and Joosung Jun