More than Decisions: Reviews of American Law Reports in the Pre-West Era

48 Pages Posted: 24 Jun 2015

Date Written: June 19, 2015

Abstract

In the early nineteenth century, both general literary periodicals and the first American legal journals often featured reviews of new volumes of U.S. Supreme Court and state court opinions, suggesting their importance not only to lawyers seeking the latest cases, but to members of the public. The reviews contributed to public discourse through comments on issues raised in the cases and the quality of the reporting, and were valued as forums for commentary on the law and its role in American society, particularly during debates on codification and the future of the common law in the 1820s. James Kent saw the reports as worthy of study by scholars of taste and literature, or to be read for their drama and displays of great feeling. By the 1840s fewer lengthy reviews of reports were published in the journals, but shorter reviews continued in the years prior to and after the Civil War; they largely disappeared with the emergence of West’s National Reporter System and other privately published reporters in the 1880s. This paper examines role and influences of the reviews in earlier decades of the century.

Keywords: Law Journals; Law Reports; Legal Information; Reviews of Law Books; Nineteenth American Legal History

Suggested Citation

Danner, Richard A., More than Decisions: Reviews of American Law Reports in the Pre-West Era (June 19, 2015). Duke Law School Public Law & Legal Theory Series No. 2015-27, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2622299 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2622299

Richard A. Danner (Contact Author)

Duke University School of Law ( email )

Box 90361
Durham, NC 27708
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.duke.edu/fac/danner/

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
160
Abstract Views
1,635
Rank
361,292
PlumX Metrics