'Control', 'Ownership' and the Beneficiary of the Discretionary Trust: Case Note

Australian Bar Review, 31 1: 128-131

Posted: 26 Jun 2015

See all articles by Lee Aitken

Lee Aitken

The University of Hong Kong - Faculty of Law

Date Written: 2008

Abstract

Recent cases in the Federal (ASIC v Carey (No 6)) and Family Court (Stephens v Stephens) have contained the heterodox suggestion that in certain circumstances a court would be entitled to disregard the formal declaration of a trust in favour of a discretionary beneficiary (who is also frequently appointor) and treat that beneficiary as enjoying some form of ‘property’ interest in the trust property, prior to any appointment in his favour (see, generally, Dr John Glover, for an astringent analysis of the decisions). As a result of this ‘property’ interest, the court is empowered according to the applicable statute to make orders with respect to the trust property. In Public Trustee v Smith Justice White has examined the cases and in a detailed obiter analysis has explained the limitations on their potential operation.

JEL Classification: K00

Suggested Citation

Aitken, Lee, 'Control', 'Ownership' and the Beneficiary of the Discretionary Trust: Case Note (2008). Australian Bar Review, 31 1: 128-131. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2622787

Lee Aitken (Contact Author)

The University of Hong Kong - Faculty of Law ( email )

Pokfulam Road
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
China

HOME PAGE: http://hub.hku.hk/rp/rp01235

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
132
PlumX Metrics