Evolution of Conflict in the Courts of Appeals

33 Pages Posted: 3 Jul 2015

Date Written: June 25, 2015


Conflicts between the Courts of Appeals are of central importance to the American judiciary. When circuits split, federal law is applied differently in different parts of the country. It has long been known that the existence of a circuit split is the best predictor of Supreme Court review, but data availability has constrained understanding of circuit splits to this fact. In this paper, we explore the “life cycle” of an intercircuit split. We analyze an original dataset that comprises a sample of conflicts between Courts of Appeals that existed between 2005 and 2013, including both conflicts the Supreme Court resolved and conflicts it has not yet resolved. We show how long a conflict exists before it is resolved and how many go unresolved altogether, which conflicts are resolved soonest, and how a conflict grows across circuits.

Suggested Citation

Beim, Deborah and Rader, Kelly, Evolution of Conflict in the Courts of Appeals (June 25, 2015). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2623304 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2623304

Deborah Beim

Yale University ( email )

New Haven, CT 06520
United States

Kelly Rader (Contact Author)

Yale University ( email )

Box 208269
New Haven, CT 06520-8269
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics