Protecting the Privacies of Digital Life: Riley v. California, the Fourth Amendment's Particularity Requirement, and Search Protocols for Cell Phone Search Warrants

37 Pages Posted: 6 Jul 2015

See all articles by William Clark

William Clark

Boston College, Law School, Students

Date Written: June 30, 2015

Abstract

In 2014, in Riley v. California, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the police must obtain a warrant before searching a cell phone. Lower courts have struggled to determine what scope limitations judges should place on cell phone warrants in order to ensure that these warrants do not devolve into general searches. This Note argues that the Fourth Amendment’s particularity requirement mandates that the government submit search protocols, technical documents that explain the search methods the government will use on the seized device, for cell phone search warrants. Detailed search protocols will ensure that cell phone search warrants have a particularized scope and thereby protect the privacies of life modern cell phones contain.

Suggested Citation

Clark, William, Protecting the Privacies of Digital Life: Riley v. California, the Fourth Amendment's Particularity Requirement, and Search Protocols for Cell Phone Search Warrants (June 30, 2015). Boston College Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2625117

William Clark (Contact Author)

Boston College, Law School, Students ( email )

Chestnut Hill, MA
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
104
Abstract Views
841
rank
253,886
PlumX Metrics