Not Available for Download

The Future of the Federal Death Penalty

Ohio Northern University Law Review, Vol. 26, January 2001

Posted: 22 Mar 2001  

Rory K. Little

University of California Hastings College of the Law

Abstract

On May 16, 2001, the federal government carried out its first execution for a criminal offense in over 38 years (Timothy McVeigh). This article (part of a symposium issue) examines recent developments in the administration of the federal death penalty, in the legislative, judicial, and executive (Department of Justice) arenas. While not an abolitionist, the author expresses misgivings about federal capital punishment as it is currently administered, updating statistics regarding racial and geographic disparity from his 1999 article "The Federal Death Penalty: History and Some Thoughts About the Department of Justice's Role," 26 Fordham Urb. L. J. 347. The article also explains "What the Supreme Court Got Wrong in Jones," 527 U.S. 373 (1999). Finally, the international implications of the first execution by the federal government in two generations are explored. No longer can the United States shift its internationally isolated position regarding capital punishment onto its constituent states under a theory of independent federalism.

Notes: This is a description of the paper and not the actual abstract.

JEL Classification: K14, K40

Suggested Citation

Little, Rory K., The Future of the Federal Death Penalty. Ohio Northern University Law Review, Vol. 26, January 2001. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=262607

Rory K. Little (Contact Author)

University of California Hastings College of the Law ( email )

200 McAllister Street
Room 329
San Francisco, CA 94102
United States
415-565-4669 (Phone)
415-565-4865 (Fax)

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
961