Costly Designs

51 Pages Posted: 6 Jul 2015 Last revised: 7 Jun 2016

See all articles by Sarah Burstein

Sarah Burstein

The University of Oklahoma College of Law

Date Written: July 19, 2015

Abstract

Design patents have been repeatedly criticized for being too expensive. Many of these critics argue that the cost of design patent examination is a fatal flaw in the system. This Article utilizes recent insights in costly screen theory to evaluate whether the costliness of design protection is really as problematic as the current literature suggests. It argues that there is a real cost to granting bad design patents and that the cost of design patent examination serves a valuable function — independent of its function of facilitating substantive review — by screening out at least some bad design patents. At the same time, this costly screen is unlikely to discourage the creation of valuable designs in any significant way. This suggests that the costliness of design patents may actually have a net positive effect on social welfare. This Article also considers the implications of these conclusions for other issues of design patent policy.

Keywords: design patents, patents, intellectual property, IP, Patent & Trademark Office, costly screens

Suggested Citation

Burstein, Sarah, Costly Designs (July 19, 2015). 77 Ohio St. L.J. 107 (2016), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2627065

Sarah Burstein (Contact Author)

The University of Oklahoma College of Law ( email )

300 Timberdell Road
Norman, OK 73019
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.ou.edu/content/burstein-sarah

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
412
Abstract Views
2,964
rank
79,070
PlumX Metrics