40 Pages Posted: 30 Mar 2001
This article - a sequel to Professor Colker's article, The Americans with Disabilities Act: A Windfall for Defendants - analyzes appellate employment discrimination decisions in ADA cases that are available on Westlaw. She compares ADA judicial outcomes to those under other statutes, and suggests that ADA outcomes are more pro-defendant than outcomes under other civil rights statutes. She entertains and rejects one hypothesis for this result - that the ADA is a new statute experiencing an early period of judicial uncertainty. Having determined that judicial uncertainty has not been a factor in predicting ADA appellate outcomes, she uses a logistic regression analysis to determine what factors do predict ADA appellate outcomes. She concludes that the most important predictors of success by plaintiffs appear to be EEOC participation, being represented by counsel, and the circuit in which the plaintiff litigated. She found a modest trend toward certain types of disabilities associating with positive outcomes but predicts that those results are likely to disappear, or even reverse, in light of intervening Supreme Court decisions. Surprisingly, she did not find that the theory of disability or whether a plaintiff requested an accommodation was a significant factor in predicting appellate outcome.
Keywords: disability discrimination, employment discrimination, judicial outcomes, empirical research
JEL Classification: J7
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Colker, Ruth, Winning and Losing under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Ohio State Law Journal, Vol. 62. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=262832 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.262832